Cartoon banned by apostate Mormons. What they don't want you to see. [Archive]

Father_JD

09-22-2010, 07:30 AM

The cartoon apostates don't want you to see. (http://video.filestube.com/watch,49e4abdc887811e503e9/Cartoon-Banned-By-Anti-Mormons-The-OneThat-They-Don-t-Want-You-To-See.html)

Ooooh. Taking clips from the Simpsons, showing Homer doing his "thing" and then likening "Anti-Mormons" to Homer.

Wow. So terrible. So horrifying. So worth "banning".

Not.

I think Homer's shenanigans fit the Mormon perfectly: An oaf who's gullible enough to believe in Hebrew-speaking, Egypian-writing American Indians practicing full-****n Christianity in their cement cites hundreds of years before Christ's own Advent. ;)

Richard

09-22-2010, 08:13 AM

Ooooh. Taking clips from the Simpsons, showing Homer doing his "thing" and then likening "Anti-Mormons" to Homer.

Wow. So terrible. So horrifying. So worth "banning".

Not.

I think Homer's shenanigans fit the Mormon perfectly: An oaf who's gullible enough to believe in Hebrew-speaking, Egypian-writing American Indians practicing full-****n Christianity in their cement cites hundreds of years before Christ's own Advent. ;)

Nice signature, wonder what the rules state, Hmmm---

"signature should not include any insulting comments made either by you or another board member"

Just above we have a warning by our Moderator, "The definition of a derogatory term is one that insults, belittles or treats a group or individual with contempt".

Not a signature, shame on you, hopefully we will see this edited out also, watching you good buddy, keep it civil.

Father_JD

09-22-2010, 02:57 PM

Yeah. Let's pontificate some more, "Richard"...if that's your real name.

Vlad III

09-22-2010, 04:00 PM

I think Homer's shenanigans fit the Mormon perfectly: An oaf who's gullible enough to believe in Hebrew-speaking, Egypian-writing American Indians practicing full-****n Christianity in their cement cites hundreds of years before Christ's own Advent. ;)

So much for not being against Mormon PEOPLE. But oddly enough Father JD was this 'oaf' at one time, only he gave it all up to align with a religion that thinks it's okay for its members and leaders to have sex with each other even if they are both men.

I'll take an ancient civilization that practiced 'Christianity' over a modern religion that thinks the above practice of ****sexuality is what they think Jesus approves of anyday!

Billyray

09-22-2010, 04:04 PM

So much for not being against Mormon PEOPLE.

Vlad you seem to have a persecution complex. Why don't you join in and discuss the issues?

Richard

09-22-2010, 04:11 PM

So much for not being against Mormon PEOPLE. But oddly enough Father JD was this 'oaf' at one time, only he gave it all up to align with a religion that thinks it's okay for its members and leaders to have sex with each other even if they are both men.

I'll take an ancient civilization that practiced 'Christianity' over a modern religion that thinks the above practice of ****sexuality is what they think Jesus approves of anyday!

Oaf? and we are told not to use the word anti-mormon? Oh, well, some use crudeness and some use labels (name calling), and some? well, they are just nice people.

JD? we ought to do a poll. Chuckle.

Rj.

Richard

09-22-2010, 04:13 PM

Yeah. Let's pontificate some more, "Richard"...if that's your real name.

No, my real name is D I C K. Chuckle.

Vlad III

09-22-2010, 04:13 PM

Vlad you seem to have a persecution complex. Why don't you join in and discuss the issues?

No, you've just fallen victim to the Mormon-antagonist's penchant for playing the "persecution-card"-card at the wrong time.

Pointing out when someone is disparaging a PEOPLE does not mean that the person pointing it out is feeling persecuted at all.

I suppose that if Jesus pointed out that people were mocking the Jews you would claim that Jesus is just suffering from a persecution complex, right? :rolleyes:

Too bad you and your fellow MA's have played your persecution-card-card so much that it has no value anymore.

Richard

09-22-2010, 04:18 PM

No, you've just fallen victim to the Mormon-antagonist's penchant for playing the "persecution-card"-card at the wrong time.

Pointing out when someone is disparaging a PEOPLE does not mean that the person pointing it out is feeling persecuted at all.

I suppose that if Jesus pointed out that people were mocking the Jews you would claim that Jesus is just suffering from a persecution complex, right? :rolleyes:

Too bad you and your fellow MA's have played your persecution-card-card so much that it has no value anymore.

Hmmm, Persecution card, antiquated talking points, sarcasm, false accusations, false witnesses, out of context quotes, misrepresentations, sensationalism (my favorite), and last but not least, proving everything by quoting there CREEDS. Chuckle. :confused:

Rj.

Billyray

09-22-2010, 04:23 PM

Too bad you and your fellow MA's have played your persecution-card-card so much that it has no value anymore.

Vlad, step back and look at all of your posts since you have been back. They simply criticize non Mormons. Your posts have had no substance to them at all. Why not argue on the evidence? If what you believe is true then you should be able to back up your claim. The truthfulness of the Mormon Church is independent of your criticism of individual posters.

Richard

09-22-2010, 04:34 PM

In watching the video I have one question, just what good did the false prophet Joseph Smith ever do?

Book of Mormon...

Vlad III

09-22-2010, 06:41 PM

Vlad, step back and look at all of your posts since you have been back. They simply criticize non Mormons.

Not criticize but point out the problems in the non-Mormons here that use name-calling, polemics, and taunts in order to witness for Jesus. Notice all my posts that you claim are 'criticizing' non-mormon posters follow posts from those non-mormons where they use such anti-christian-like tactics to peddle their jesus.

Your posts have had no substance to them at all.

Says you. You're en***led to that opinion.

Why not argue on the evidence? If what you believe is true then you should be able to back up your claim.

I just did. I believe you, as a critic, use the fallacy of the "persecution-complex-card" too much and in wrong ways....and I proved it by providing you examples.

The truthfulness of the Mormon Church is independent of your criticism of individual posters.

I agree. That's why I have focused recently on the criticisms of individual posters, since as you rightfully said, the truthfulness of the LDS church is independant of them, and there is no need for me to corroborate that truthfulness since it DOES stand independant of you guys that seek to try and disprove it.

Billyray

09-22-2010, 06:47 PM

I agree. That's why I have focused recently on the criticisms of individual posters, since as you rightfully said, the truthfulness of the LDS church is independant of them, and there is no need for me to corroborate that truthfulness since it DOES stand independant of you guys that seek to try and disprove it.

So why not address the facts about the Church rather than comment on the posters. Whether or not I am a nice or mean person has no bearing at all on the truthfulness of Mormonism. However LDS seem to believe that showing that a person is really mean or a sinner somehow proves Mormonism true. Can you explain that to me?

Vlad III

09-22-2010, 07:18 PM

So why not address the facts about the Church rather than comment on the posters. Whether or not I am a nice or mean person has no bearing at all on the truthfulness of Mormonism. However LDS seem to believe that showing that a person is really mean or a sinner somehow proves Mormonism true. Can you explain that to me?

Sure.

First, you err in your evaluation. Showing the "fruits" (as you and your other cohort Mormon-antagonists pride yourself on) of the Mormon-critic isn't about proving Mormonism true. It is true regardless of your rotten fruits.

As you state, the LDS church's truthfulness has no bearing on a person's niceness or meaness. It is true regardless. So now I look to those attacking it (like yourself) and I have to question why, if what I believe is wrong and what they believe is right, why are they so filled with "bad" fruits that they have to call Mormons names, castigate us all to Hell simply for not believing the theology they are peddling, and taunting and provoking LDS by making claims about their mental states and/or their ability to self-think.

It's just too easy to point out the desperation in you and your fellow Mormon-antagonists when you claim the behavior of LDS is 'rotten fruit' of the faith when such behavior might simply be breaking a rule of a message board forum. You guys proclaim that a Mormon doing something wrong is evidence of the 'rotten fruit' of the religion. And yet the truth of the LDS church still holds true, like you said.

Funny that today alone, a pastor of a mega Baptist church is under investigation for sexual misconduct and two teachers were arrested for throwing sex parties with underage teenagers (and one of the teachers worked at a Baptist school). And yet, it is you guys that claim the beaking of a message board rule by a LDS is the rotten fruit of Mormonism. Where's the consistency? LOL

SO the bottom line is showing your meaness, hypocrisy, taunts, namecalling, etc isn;t about proving Mormonism true, since it is true independant as you rightfully said. It is showing that you have nothing better to offer since whatever jesus you are claiming we should follow leads you to producing fruit that doesn't compare at all to the good fruit we in the LDS have found.

Billyray

09-22-2010, 07:35 PM

As you state, the LDS church's truthfulness has no bearing on a person's niceness or meaness.

That is not exactly what I said. What I said is that the LDS church is true or false independent of me. For example atheism is not true simply because an atheist is a really nice person, on the other hand atheism is not false because the atheist is a really mean person. This is different than saying that a true Christian will have good fruit in his life--which is a completely different point than the one that I was trying to make. I hope that you can differentiate the difference.

It is showing that you have nothing better to offer since whatever jesus you are claiming we should follow leads you to producing fruit that doesn't compare at all to the good fruit we in the LDS have found.

So if you meet a person who has really good fruit who is a scientologist that fact alone makes scientology true?

The same argument could also be made with the Pharisees verses the apostles. The Pharisees kept the rules and looked better on the outside but we both know that they were on the wrong path.

SO the bottom line is showing your meaness, hypocrisy, taunts, namecalling, etc isn;t about proving Mormonism true, since it is true independant as you rightfully said.
First off I never said that Mormonism is true. Mormonism is false. So lets get that one straight right off of the bat.

You make the claim that Mormonism is true. What is the best proof of Mormonism besides your testimony?

Vlad III

09-22-2010, 07:55 PM

That is not exactly what I said. What I said is that the LDS church is true or false independent of me.

Hmmm, a little revisionist history? LOL

Here's what you you said, word for word, "The truthfulness of the Mormon Church is independent of your criticism of individual posters."

--- I agree. The truthfulness of the Mormon church is independent of my criticism of those attacking it.

You did not say that the LDS church is true or false independent of you. You said what you said, that the church's truthfulness is independent of you.....and i agree with your ***essment.

So if you meet a person who has really good fruit who is a scientologist that fact alone makes scientology true?

No. When I see people claiming that a true church is false based on the actions of a member, I have to question why they only use that criterian when it suits their agenda. Why doesn;t that rule apply when it is a member of their own church or belief system?

And secondly, that the LDS church is true and I have seen the good fruit it produces, I have to point out the irony in those who attack the LDS church and do so using poor fruit and tactics that are an***hetical to what Jesus would have them do.

The same argument could also be made with the Pharisees verses the apostles. The Pharisees kept the rules and looked better on the outside but we both know that they were on the wrong path.

So maybe you could take that counsel to your fellow Mormon-antagonoists that have recently poinded their chests that Mormonism is false and produces poor fruit because of the actions of one of its members.

Unless consistency and fair-mindedness are not high priorities on your list.

First off I never said that Mormonism is true. Mormonism is false. So lets get that one straight right off of the bat.

No, you said, "The truthfulness of the Mormon Church is independent of your criticism of individual posters."

I agree. The turthfulness of Mormonism is not dependent on any of us here. True is true. :D

Billyray

09-22-2010, 08:04 PM

Hmmm, a little revisionist history? LOL

Here's what you you said, word for word, "The truthfulness of the Mormon Church is independent of your criticism of individual posters."

--- I agree. The truthfulness of the Mormon church is independent of my criticism of those attacking it.

You did not say that the LDS church is true or false independent of you. You said what you said, that the church's truthfulness is independent of you.....and i agree with your ***essment.
I think that we agree here. The truthfulness or falsehood of the LDS church is independent of you and of me. It is independent of your criticism of me and my criticism of you. That is the whole point. Don't you agree with this?

Billyray

09-22-2010, 08:09 PM

The turthfulness of Mormonism is not dependent on any of us here.

I agree with you. So the next question is obvious.

Why do you think that Mormonism true?

Vlad III

09-22-2010, 08:11 PM

I think that we agree here. The truthfulness or falsehood of the LDS church is independent of you and of me. It is independent of your criticism of me and my criticism of you. That is the whole point. Don't you agree with this?

I see you have revised your original statement to include 'or falsehood'. I can understand why you must back peddle from your original statement. :D

Vlad III

09-22-2010, 08:12 PM

I agree with you. So the next question is obvious.

Why do you think that Mormonism true?

Because it is. Independent of me or you or our thoughts as to why or why not. ;)

Billyray

09-22-2010, 08:16 PM

I see you have revised your original statement to include 'or falsehood'. I can understand why you must back peddle from your original statement. :D
You know that I believe that the LDS church is false don't you? Did you really not understand the point that I was trying to make? Really?

Billyray

09-22-2010, 08:18 PM

Because it is. Independent of me or you or our thoughts as to why or why not. ;)

I know that you "know" that the LDS church is true. But why do you "know" that Mormonism true?

Vlad III

09-22-2010, 08:28 PM

I know that you "know" that the LDS church is true. But why do you "know" that Mormonism true?

The same reason I know that the sun makes things bright, that touching a hot stove hurts, etc.... :)

Vlad III

09-22-2010, 08:29 PM

You know that I believe that the LDS church is false don't you? Did you really not understand the point that I was trying to make? Really?

I understand your point. I also understood your plain words. Maybe it was just a freudian slip of the keyboard. :p

Billyray

09-22-2010, 08:32 PM

The same reason I know that the sun makes things bright, that touching a hot stove hurts, etc....

So physical evidence. OK. What physical evidence best supports Mormonism?

Vlad III

09-22-2010, 08:34 PM

So physical evidence. OK. What physical evidence best supports Mormonism?

Not so much physical evidence.

I was going for experience. Once you have experienced something that's true, it is pretty hard to deny it. And I've had plenty of experiences to solidify my beliefs in the restored gospel.

Billyray

09-22-2010, 08:39 PM

I understand your point. I also understood your plain words. Maybe it was just a freudian slip of the keyboard. :p

Not a freudian slip but rather you and I reading my written sentence differently I guess. To me this does not affirm the truthfulness of the Mormon church but rather states that the truthfulness of the church is independent of my criticism etc. But it was obvious that you did not read it as it was intended on my part.

"The truthfulness of the Mormon church is independent of my criticism of those attacking it."

Billyray

09-22-2010, 08:40 PM

Not so much physical evidence.

I was going for experience. Once you have experienced something that's true, it is pretty hard to deny it. And I've had plenty of experiences to solidify my beliefs in the restored gospel.

When you say experiences what types of experiences do you mean?

Vlad III

09-22-2010, 09:21 PM

When you say experiences what types of experiences do you mean?

"That depends on what the meaning of 'is'....is"

c'mon. Experiences in the gospel. Experiences in life. Experiences in putting doctrine into practice. Kind of a no brainer.

Billyray

09-22-2010, 09:58 PM

"That depends on what the meaning of 'is'....is"

c'mon. Experiences in the gospel. Experiences in life. Experiences in putting doctrine into practice. Kind of a no brainer.

Do you think that these "experiences" are unique to Mormonism?

Vlad III

09-22-2010, 10:13 PM

Do you think that these "experiences" are unique to Mormonism?

Some of them. Sure.

Billyray

09-22-2010, 10:23 PM

Some of them. Sure.

Which ones do you feel are unique to Mormonism?

Vlad III

09-22-2010, 11:19 PM

Which ones do you feel are unique to Mormonism?

All the ones that deal with Mormon doctrine, of course. Experiences with temples, patriarchal blessings, etc....undeniable stuff in my life. That's the beauty of the gospel. It isn't about finding a scroll, a rock, or a relic to corroborate my beliefs and faith. It's about actual experiences and witnesses of the truth by the Holy Spirit. The kind of experiences that you can't deny even if you wanted to because they actually happened and you knew they happened.

Billyray

09-22-2010, 11:22 PM

All the ones that deal with Mormon doctrine, of course. Experiences with temples, patriarchal blessings, etc....undeniable stuff in my life. That's the beauty of the gospel. It isn't about finding a scroll, a rock, or a relic to corroborate my beliefs and faith. It's about actual experiences and witnesses of the truth by the Holy Spirit. The kind of experiences that you can't deny even if you wanted to because they actually happened and you knew they happened.

But you realize that many people of different faiths have personal and spiritual experiences that they feel are unique to their particular faith that for them confirms their believe in that particular faith.

Vlad III

09-22-2010, 11:33 PM

But you realize that many people of different faiths have personal and spiritual experiences that they feel are unique to their particular faith that for them confirms their believe in that particular faith.

Yep. I say good for them. Only the HS can confirm the truth to one's heart.

Billyray

09-22-2010, 11:39 PM

Yep. I say good for them. Only the HS can confirm the truth to one's heart.

To which many different people of different faiths would agree. The problem is that by this standard everybody is right.

Father_JD

09-23-2010, 04:54 AM

No, my real name is D I C K. Chuckle.

Now that I can believe for a reason I can't post here...:D

Richard

09-23-2010, 09:01 PM

Now that I can believe for a reason I can't post here...:D

It's all in your head fatherJD, I'm use to it, I grew up living with that name until I got to High School and soon changed it to Richard for reasons that kept me from going to the Principles office for giving a at***ude adjustment to some of my fair weather friends.

Father_JD

09-24-2010, 02:49 PM

So much for not being against Mormon PEOPLE. But oddly enough Father JD was this 'oaf' at one time, only he gave it all up to align with a religion that thinks it's okay for its members and leaders to have sex with each other even if they are both men.

I'll take an ancient civilization that practiced 'Christianity' over a modern religion that thinks the above practice of ****sexuality is what they think Jesus approves of anyday!

Homer's the OAF. But Mormons certainly emulate him, btw...;)

And what makes YOU think I approve ****sexuality? Regrettably, those in my denomination that DO are just as BLIND as Mormons...having believed the LIE of "The Holy Spirit is doing a NEW THING". :eek:

You have more in common with them than you realize. :rolleyes:

Father_JD

09-24-2010, 02:51 PM

Oaf? and we are told not to use the word anti-mormon? Oh, well, some use crudeness and some use labels (name calling), and some? well, they are just nice people.

JD? we ought to do a poll. Chuckle.

Rj.

I said Homer was the OAF. But Mormons do indeed act oafish just like Homer when they're gullible to believe in the nonsensical story of Hebrew-speaking, Egyptian writing, American Indians practicing full-****n Christianity in their cement cities centuries before Christ's own Advent.

But tell-tale ANACHRONISMS don't bother you...why! You've got a "testimony" so you checked your brains in at the door of your local "ward". :rolleyes:

Billyray

09-25-2010, 10:02 AM

Only the HS can confirm the truth to one's heart.
Tell us how the HS has confirmed the truth to your heart? Exactly.

teenapenny

09-25-2010, 06:03 PM

Book of Mormon...

Yes, it is a good book of fiction.

Richard

09-26-2010, 01:08 AM

I said Homer was the OAF. But Mormons do indeed act oafish just like Homer when they're gullible to believe in the nonsensical story of Hebrew-speaking, Egyptian writing, American Indians practicing full-****n Christianity in their cement cities centuries before Christ's own Advent.

But tell-tale ANACHRONISMS don't bother you...why! You've got a "testimony" so you checked your brains in at the door of your local "ward". :rolleyes:

Jealous? Chuckle. So how is your substance only Testimony Going, is it working for you?

Pa Pa

09-30-2010, 12:15 PM

I guess this is suppose to be a spoof on the "Banned Mormon Cartoon"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jFZ1jVO3-OE

BTW this is a much better video than the one you posted.

You are right...you are an apostate.

Billyray

09-30-2010, 06:04 PM

You are right...you are an apostate.
Definition Merriam-Webster
apos·ta·sy noun \ə-ˈpäs-tə-sē\
1 renunciation of a religious faith
2 abandonment of a previous loyalty : defection

PaPa, I agree with you 100%. I have completely renounced Mormonism. Why have I done this? Because Mormonism is a false religion, worships a false god, and follows a false gospel. Do you really think that I should remain a member of this type of organization?

alanmolstad

02-12-2014, 06:57 AM

Ooooh. Taking clips from the Simpsons, showing Homer doing his "thing" and then likening "Anti-Mormons" to Homer.

Wow. So terrible. So horrifying. So worth "banning".

Not.

I think Homer's shenanigans fit the Mormon perfectly: An oaf who's gullible enough to believe in Hebrew-speaking, Egypian-writing American Indians practicing full-****n Christianity in their cement cites hundreds of years before Christ's own Advent. ;)

Good post.

The ***le of this topic caught my eye, but after clicking on the link all we see is a bunch of clips from the simpsons and a bunch of anti-Christ text added on top....and a ****py song to go along with it.

Now the video might have been banned off of Youtube as it does make use of copywight material,but aside from that I have to go along with the comments copied above..

It's not worth worrying about....and the video quality sucks.