Correspondence from William Law

[alanmolstad]

http://www.truthandgrace.com/1887SLTribune0703.htm

[theway]

http://www.truthandgrace.com/1887SLTribune0703.htm
Once again... An example of an AntiMormon quoting an AntiMormon quoting another AntiMormon.

Tell me Alan.... When you read this type of AntiMormon nonsense, do you...

A. Accept it as the gospel truth because it is negative against the Church, therefore, any evidence that contradicts it needs not be considered at all?

B. Consider it "He said, she said" and take no position, but will post it anyway without posting the other side of the argument?

C. Consider it false outright based on other evidence that is contrary to it, but post it anyway because Lying for the Lord is OK by you?