Originally Posted by
MichaellS
After repeat attempts, I find Alan either incapable or unwilling to discuss his approach to sound exegete. I was even denied reason when I used the same reasoning being fostered by him to begin the discussion. Interesting, anything that might challenge the “high thing” I called approach to, was to first discuss the foundation – also resisted.
Therein it is more important to substantiate conviction in the word. Yes, as I also detailed. Sorry for the thread misuse. Out of courtesy, we should show some form of manners.