Originally Posted by
Phoenix
My argument is merely that your argument is so full of double standards and nonsensical "logic" that it would be laughed out of a real debate. Your premise--that if the original autographs of a document are currently unavailable, then everyone should conclude that the original never existed--is laughably false, wrong, incorrect, etc.
Your reasoning is so irrational that you actually refute yourself, without realizing it, when you say that the known, admitted lack of any original Bible documents doesn't mean that we should conclude that they never existed.
That's pretty much how you lost the debate.