Search:

Type: Posts; User: BigJulie

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. I gave you a whole site--that isn't even LDS....

    I gave you a whole site--that isn't even LDS. (See post #3)
  2. Actually, as I said, there are whole non-Mormon...

    Actually, as I said, there are whole non-Mormon sites that go into debates against these new translations.
  3. But where did Luke get it? And what makes...

    But where did Luke get it? And what makes something more reliable when one does not have the original. Maybe a later one is more reliable because those who wrote it were more experienced with the...
  4. How do they know it was copied over from Luke as...

    How do they know it was copied over from Luke as they did not have the original m****cripts. (No one does as far as I know.)
  5. I gave you an example where the text was...

    I gave you an example where the text was completely omitted. So, why was it omitted from one? Did it change the context of the surrounding scriptures or the understanding of the surrounding...
  6. Well, I gave you an example from a non-LDS site...

    Well, I gave you an example from a non-LDS site that shows that a verse was completely omitted. Does that change the meaning of that text---well, if it doesn't exist now, how could it have the same...
  7. Here is one:...

    Here is one:
    http://av1611.com/kjbp/charts/various.html

    Here is an example:

    AV (King James): For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost.
    New International: OMITTED
    New American...
  8. There are non-Mormon sites who make this...

    There are non-Mormon sites who make this argument. Many believe some of the newer versions do not adequately portray the scriptures.
Results 1 to 8 of 8