Curious on this Saxon, where did he say, link or forward such reliance? Earlier on, I did spend some effort asking Alan to retrieve at least some portion in the world of academia that supports his position. But if I'm not mistaken he maintains so many have wrongly interpreted this p***age, and I suppose that includes the world of formal training. I myself have run that down to some degree and have serious reservations for the amount Alan could generate from them, that quite nearly all scholars wouldn't throw-in with Alan's view.

If anyone could, please, prove me wrong.
Alan did use a link but when I read it, for the most part, it was in agreement with me. He has never quoted any extra-biblical source that supports his version of this issue.

When he quotes the Bible he always ignores 1 Corinthians 11:3, which is the key to understanding the whole topic as far as I am concerned. What he is saying makes no sense because 1 Corinthians 11:3 defines the head that is to be covered or uncovered and it is clearly not the human body part.

The hair issue that Paul uses is used as an example of how a woman “covers” her man/husband. The covering is not placing something on your head, man or body part, it is making sure that the woman’s behavior is not bringing reproach to her man/husband. The man, keeping his head (Christ) uncovered is a man being sure that Christ is revealed in his praying and prophesying. Hair is not the issue at all.

1 Corinthians 11:3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.