Page 10 of 20 FirstFirst ... 67891011121314 ... LastLast
Results 226 to 250 of 498

Thread: was lucifer created evil?

  1. #226
    Father_JD
    Guest

    Default

    Clearly you didn't understand a thing from my post, stem.

    I was using the legitimate Ad Hominem argument in which one argues his opponent's position to its logical conclusion.

    Your only escape from your own dilemma which you pose which is equally applicable to the Mormo-god, is to "cop out" and posit the Mormo-god is NOT OMNISCIENT.

    But as typical Mormon who you are, you wanna have your Green Goddess Jell-O and eat it, too.

  2. #227
    Father_JD
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stemelbow View Post
    So you concede the point that your beleif system shows God to be the very source of all evil? Interesting concession, JD. As for my belief system....Col. 1 does not in anyway refute it. Nice try though.

    love,
    stem
    You weren't paying attention, stem. God is NOT THE SOURCE OF ALL EVIL. The biblical position is GOD IS NOT THE AUTHOR OF EVIL.

    Plain and simple.

    The answer is SECONDARY CREATION which you keep running away from.

  3. #228
    Sentinus
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stem
    Find me a credible, modern day mainstream Christian who accepts pre-mortal existence of all beings.
    First off define "Exist". And ask yourself if God didn't think you existed would you?

    One thing I like about the Endowment is that first all things were created spiritually and then realized physically only after the spiritual creation. One must think of something before one can create. For most the very idea that God thought of us is the definition of pre-existent life. To most Mainstreamers I know "Nothing" exists outside of God.. Hence the belief of creation ex nilio. This idea of creating from nothing makes absolutely no sense to us as "reasonable" and "logical" human beings. It forces us to wonder "How can something come from nothing?" and then we have people who later come along and say that since its illogical it MUST be false. This is why you can't grasp that "Good" and "Evil" are only definitions applied by finite beings and is why you cannot grasp "Something" from "Nothing". You and many, many people LDS and Non want to impose mans finite reasoning onto an infinite God. It just doesn't work, and IMO NEVER will.

    Kind regards,
    Sentinus

  4. #229
    nrajeff
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Father_JD View Post
    Yes, those Evans are wrong. ALL people are involved in SECONDARY CREATION of some kind or another. "Create" does NOT necessarily connote "something from nothing".
    ---So God is NOT the author of everything that exists?


    Give me those "Evans" numbers, jeff. I'll set them straight!!
    ---Here is their address: "Carm, c/o Matt Slick, The Internet."

  5. #230
    Father_JD
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nrajeff View Post
    ---So God is NOT the author of everything that exists?
    No. The Bible declares God is NOT THE AUTHOR OF EVIL, jeff.



    ---Here is their address: "Carm, c/o Matt Slick, The Internet."

    Har har.

  6. #231
    stemelbow
    Guest

    Default

    Even more...you demonstrate you only think you know what you're talking about. In reality all you got is a pile of ambiguous quotes which you use to mean something they don't necessarily mean, then proclaim, "I, JD, Speak for God". Talk about false prophets.

    love,
    stem

  7. #232
    stemelbow
    Guest

    Default

    You argued sans logic, JD. That's the whole point. I've already explained how your silly attempt at being logical, for once, is nothing more than your misunderstanding of the issues presented. It was an adorable show, JD.

    love,
    stem

  8. #233
    Sentinus
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stemelbow View Post
    You argued sans logic, JD. That's the whole point. I've already explained how your silly attempt at being logical, for once, is nothing more than your misunderstanding of the issues presented. It was an adorable show, JD.

    love,
    stem
    Do you take lessons in condescension or is it a natural gift?

    Care to address my post?? If not cool..

    Kind regards,
    Sentinus

    Edited to add. I have just read a few other exchanges between you and JD. It seems that you two have a mutual way of trading punches so please ignore my post as far it concerns your responses to JD.
    Last edited by Sentinus; 12-21-2009 at 12:57 PM.

  9. #234
    stemelbow
    Guest

    Default

    I appreciate your edit. Yes, JD and I have been at it for years, and I admit to mirroring the approaches that come my way. I don't say its a good thing but sometimes I find it the best way to get somewhere with him....I do the same with others. He might say I started the condescension...I don't know. Its turned kinda fun in a sick way, and in another way it gets us to the point pretty quickly.

    I didn't see your post. I'll recheck.

    love,
    stem

  10. #235
    Sentinus
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stemelbow View Post
    I appreciate your edit. Yes, JD and I have been at it for years, and I admit to mirroring the approaches that come my way. I don't say its a good thing but sometimes I find it the best way to get somewhere with him....I do the same with others. He might say I started the condescension...I don't know. Its turned kinda fun in a sick way, and in another way it gets us to the point pretty quickly.

    I didn't see your post. I'll recheck.

    love,
    stem
    Quote Originally Posted by Stem
    I appreciate your edit.
    No prob, just want to be fair. You both have a gift IMO...

    Quote Originally Posted by Stem
    I didn't see your post. I'll recheck.
    Thanks. http://www.waltermartin.com//forums/...&postcount=228

    Kind regards,
    Sentinus

  11. #236
    Father_JD
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stemelbow View Post
    You argued sans logic, JD. That's the whole point. I've already explained how your silly attempt at being logical, for once, is nothing more than your misunderstanding of the issues presented. It was an adorable show, JD.

    love,
    stem
    I see you've jettisoned your pet phrase of, "bald ***ertion" to "an adorable show", stem...or are you a pod person who did away with the real stemmy?

    I've explained it to you several times now:

    Your only escape is to posit that the Mormo-deity isn't omniscient.

  12. #237
    stemelbow
    Guest

    Default

    I already explained my escape for which you haven't addressed, JD. I haven't wholly adopted an adorable show, but it does describe your gaming here quite well. Stay tuned we'll see if it sticks.

    love,
    stem

  13. #238
    Father_JD
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stemelbow View Post
    I already explained my escape for which you haven't addressed, JD. I haven't wholly adopted an adorable show, but it does describe your gaming here quite well. Stay tuned we'll see if it sticks.

    love,
    stem
    Did the Mormo-god FOREKNOW Lucifer's "evil designs", stem?

    YES or NO???

  14. #239
    stemelbow
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sentinus View Post
    First off define "Exist". And ask yourself if God didn't think you existed would you?

    One thing I like about the Endowment is that first all things were created spiritually and then realized physically only after the spiritual creation. One must think of something before one can create. For most the very idea that God thought of us is the definition of pre-existent life. To most Mainstreamers I know "Nothing" exists outside of God.. Hence the belief of creation ex nilio. This idea of creating from nothing makes absolutely no sense to us as "reasonable" and "logical" human beings. It forces us to wonder "How can something come from nothing?" and then we have people who later come along and say that since its illogical it MUST be false. This is why you can't grasp that "Good" and "Evil" are only definitions applied by finite beings and is why you cannot grasp "Something" from "Nothing". You and many, many people LDS and Non want to impose mans finite reasoning onto an infinite God. It just doesn't work, and IMO NEVER will.

    Kind regards,
    Sentinus
    It seems youwould claim creation ex nihilo was and then came a creation out of something. Such is not the case--creation ex nihilo doesn't really appear until much later in time. But I ask for you to prove your ***ertion--that creation ex nihilo was then came an alternative. We can go from there in any sort of investigation. It seems to me,as I said before, creation ex nihilo wasn't adopted as officially Christian dogma until hundreds of years after Christ.

    love,
    stem

  15. #240
    Sentinus
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stemelbow View Post
    It seems youwould claim creation ex nihilo was and then came a creation out of something. Such is not the case--creation ex nihilo doesn't really appear until much later in time. But I ask for you to prove your ***ertion--that creation ex nihilo was then came an alternative. We can go from there in any sort of investigation. It seems to me,as I said before, creation ex nihilo wasn't adopted as officially Christian dogma until hundreds of years after Christ.

    love,
    stem
    Quote Originally Posted by Stem
    creation ex nihilo wasn't adopted as officially Christian dogma until hundreds of years after Christ.
    An even better place to start would be for you to prove that this statement is indeed factual..

    Kind regards,
    Sentinus

  16. #241
    stemelbow
    Guest

    Default

    JD, I've already answered this. Your just playing games now--creating an adorable show.

    love,
    stem

  17. #242
    stemelbow
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sentinus View Post
    An even better place to start would be for you to prove that this statement is indeed factual..

    Kind regards,
    Sentinus
    Okay.

    According to Hatch, this theory penetrated the Christian community through Tatian in the second half of the second century:

    With Basilides [a second century Gnostic philosopher], the conception of matter was raised to a higher plane. The distinction of subject and object was preserved, so that the action of the Transcendent God was still that of creation and not of evolution; but it was "out of that which was not" that He made things to be . . . . The basis of the theory was Platonic, though some of the terms were borrowed from both Aristotle and the Stoics. It became itself the basis for the theory which ultimately prevailed in the Church. The transition appears in Tatian [ca. 170 A.D.]78
    Found here: http://www.fairlds.org/Restoring_the...ch/chap03.html

    Also to note if/when the question arises:

    The earliest Christians, as Hatch intimates, believed the Jewish doctrine81 of creation from chaos. For instance, Justin Martyr wrote, "And we have been taught that He in the beginning did of His goodness, for man's sake, create all things out of unformed matter . . . ."82 Peter himself echoed the picture presented in Genesis 1:1-2 of a watery chaos from which the world was created. The New English Bible translates these p***ages in the following way: "In the beginning of creation . . . the earth was without form and void, with darkness over the face of the abyss, and a mighty wind that swept over the surface of the waters." (Genesis 1:1-2 NEB) "There were heavens and earth long ago, created by God's word out of water and with water . . . ." (2 Peter 3:5 NEB)
    From the same place. I'd link the originals but I couldn't find them on-line. Hopefully this will get the point across and get us moving onto something.

    love,
    stem

  18. #243
    Father_JD
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stemelbow View Post
    JD, I've already answered this. Your just playing games now--creating an adorable show.

    love,
    stem
    You've certainly been paying LIP SERVICE to "omniscience" but DENY THE DOCTRINE ESSENTIALLY.

    This comes across like a small child who doesn't understand the meaning of the term, but childishly still wants to argue.

  19. #244
    stemelbow
    Guest

    Default

    I appreciate the projection for what it is, JD. 'Tis sad to see that you would play these games rather than engage the issues raised. But such is the lot of the mainstreamer I suppose. You aren't the only one.

    love,
    stem

  20. #245
    Father_JD
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stemelbow View Post
    I appreciate the projection for what it is, JD. 'Tis sad to see that you would play these games rather than engage the issues raised. But such is the lot of the mainstreamer I suppose. You aren't the only one.

    love,
    stem
    Did the Mormo-god FOREKNOW Lucifer's "evil designs", stem?

    YES or NO???

  21. #246
    stemelbow
    Guest

    Default

    Sure He did, as I've explained for I don't know how many times now for you. Since Lucifer's evil designs had gone on for eternity already, everyone knew of them--in this case, Lucifer decided to mimick them, since he was mad at God.

    love,
    stem

  22. #247
    James Banta
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stemelbow View Post
    Sure He did, as I've explained for I don't know how many times now for you. Since Lucifer's evil designs had gone on for eternity already, everyone knew of them--in this case, Lucifer decided to mimick them, since he was mad at God.

    love,
    stem
    This is because you believe there are as many Satans as there are Jesus'.. That never ending chain of gods must mean a never ending chain of devils.. GARBAGE.. IHS jim

  23. #248
    stemelbow
    Guest

    Default

    Nope...ya got my beliefs wrong, again, jim. I don't believe what you just said.

    love,
    stem

  24. #249
    Father_JD
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stemelbow View Post
    Sure He did, as I've explained for I don't know how many times now for you. Since Lucifer's evil designs had gone on for eternity already, everyone knew of them--in this case, Lucifer decided to mimick them, since he was mad at God.

    love,
    stem
    So NOW you posit that EVERYONE knew based upon Lucifer's past dirty tricks. This is an outright DENIAL OF GOD'S ATTRIBUTE OF OMNISCIENCE.

    Your Mormo-god only knows something, which is nothing more than an educated "guess", based upon past performance of someone or something.

    To mimick you, "An adorable show" stemster. Very adorable!!

  25. #250
    stemelbow
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Father_JD View Post
    So NOW you posit that EVERYONE knew based upon Lucifer's past dirty tricks. This is an outright DENIAL OF GOD'S ATTRIBUTE OF OMNISCIENCE.
    That's not what I said, JD. You have read something into my comments again without realizing you did so.

    Your Mormo-god only knows something, which is nothing more than an educated "guess", based upon past performance of someone or something.
    Again that's a mischaracterization.

    To mimick you, "An adorable show" stemster. Very adorable!!
    Your inability to deal with what I've said and ran to some deflection is the adorable show, JD.

    love,
    stem

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •