First of all, my belief is not unbiblical. It just disagrees with your interpretation.
Second, it doesn't matter that much in that Jesus' sacrifice covers all children, IMO.
First of all, my belief is not unbiblical. It just disagrees with your interpretation.
Second, it doesn't matter that much in that Jesus' sacrifice covers all children, IMO.
Get off the merry-go-round, Billy. We've already covered this territory.
weeks later and you guys are still dealing with the question of the sins of children?
Look people, the Bible clearly states that Paul was alive before the law came into his life....
This means that no matter the sins the child-Paul was doing they simply were not credited against him until he was old enough to be covered under the law...
Thats the answer people....
Thats also the only answer.....
We were talking about whether or not babies sin, not the age of accountability.
I think it's rather ridiculous to try and claim that babies commit personal sin. But, even so, you are correct that they are not held accountable.
Waiting for Billy to ask you why these children need Jesus, if they are not held accountable for sin.
Why should anyone take to heart what you personally believe especially since many of your beliefs are not in line with the scriptures. What is important is what the Bible says on this issue. Tell me Libby doesn't the Bible teach that we all sin?
Jesus is God....you dont get to heaven except via Christ no matter your age....even if you are but one hr old,,,or one moment old...you still can not enter into eternal life except via Christ.....case-closed.
thus the idea that even a day old child that dies will stand before the same Lord as i will is a very correct teaching...
so no matter that a child sins or not...they are not held to be accountable under the teachings of Paul when he said that he was once "alive" before the Law came...
Remember paul said he was 'alive"...not 'sinless'
there is a difference...
so we should NEVER think that children can not sin, as we know all sin, but that what we are taught is that regardless of the sins of a child we see that God will over look their sins and they are not held as being 'guilty" of the sins they do....
Thus as Paul teaches, they have life......
that's the teaching of the bible....that children have 'life".....
Not that they are free from sin....
not that they are free of error....
not that they are guilt-free.....
The only teaching that is supported by the text is that all of us as children were not seen as "dead" ......we were "alive"
Thats the teaching of the Bible.....
ANY OF US THAT TRY TO TWIST THIS?.........well.....they error and do not seem to want to trust the Bible it seems....
I've never said that "children" cannot sin. They most certainly can.
I am saying babies do not have the ability to sin.
They have "potential", but not yet the ability, since they can't even "reason" to know what a sin might be.
Born in sin.....yes, absolutely. Our parents were sinners, were they not? And, we all will be, soon enough.