So, Just What King of Stuff is Going on in those Temples?

[Sir]

Originally Posted by James Banta

I don't want to stray from mormonism here too far but I heard Osteen deny the Lord on national tv.. Smith didn't have the honor of such a wide denial as Osteen, but it was still before men. Jesus will therefore deny them both before the Father.. IHS jim

You "heard" that huh?

[RealFakeHair]

Originally Posted by Sir

You "heard" that huh?

Well at least he has a hot wife, alittle nutty, but hot.

[Apologette]

Originally Posted by RealFakeHair

Well at least he has a hot wife, alittle nutty, but hot.

Ask an airline stewardess about her.

[James Banta]

Originally Posted by Sir

You "heard" that huh?

What that Osteem denied Jesus or that Smith did? IHS jim

[James Banta]

Osteen or Smith. IHS jim

[James Banta]

Originally Posted by Apologette

Ask an airline stewardess about her.

Flight Attendant.. Some of these people are men these days... IHS jim

[Sir]

Originally Posted by James Banta

What that Osteem denied Jesus or that Smith did? IHS jim

I forgot I need to keep it really simple here.

You said, "I don't want to stray from mormonism here too far but I heard Osteen deny the Lord on national tv."

I said, "You heard that huh?"

So obviously I am questioning that you heard Osteen deny the Lord.

[Sir]

Originally Posted by James Banta

Flight Attendant.. Some of these people are men these days... IHS jim

She wrote "stewardess" because it was a female stewardess that had a specific incident with Mrs. Osteen.

[RealFakeHair]

Originally Posted by Apologette

Ask an airline stewardess about her.

Thats, what I meant my nutty, but she is still hot.

[James Banta]

Originally Posted by Sir

I forgot I need to keep it really simple here.

You said, "I don't want to stray from mormonism here too far but I heard Osteen deny the Lord on national tv."

I said, "You heard that huh?"

So obviously I am questioning that you heard Osteen deny the Lord.

Ok then there is no question is there.. IHS jim

[Sir]

Originally Posted by James Banta

Ok then there is no question is there.. IHS jim

Actually, yes, it was a question. In English, when a question is formed, it is followed by a symbol like this "?". For example, in your above statement, you probably should've put a "?" given the structure of your comment is normal for a question.

I also explained that I was asking about what you heard.

If you want to read it as a rhetorical question in which you don't need to answer, that's fine.

If you simply don't have an answer and cannot back up your claim, that's fine too.

At this point, I can tell that having an intelligent conversation with you is futile since obviously your responses are representative of an elementary child. I did try to keep it as simple as I could, but even then one cannot expect everyone to understand simple things.

Tell Valerie "Hi".

[James Banta]

Originally Posted by Sir

Actually, yes, it was a question. In English, when a question is formed, it is followed by a symbol like this "?". For example, in your above statement, you probably should've put a "?" given the structure of your comment is normal for a question.

I also explained that I was asking about what you heard.

If you want to read it as a rhetorical question in which you don't need to answer, that's fine. If you simply don't have an answer and cannot back up your claim, that's fine too.

At this point, I can tell that having an intelligent conversation with you is futile since obviously your responses are representative of an elementary child. I did try to keep it as simple as I could, but even then one cannot expect everyone to understand simple things.

It sure looked rhetorical to me and I ignored it. BUT if you need it answered, fine. This wasn't much if a question.. You asked "You "heard" that huh?" My answer is Yes.. Not from a anti source but directly from him.. You didn't see it sorry.. You should Pay attention! The rest of your statement here is nothing more than a personal attack and in ignored.. Except in a message I didn't think you would ignore.. IHS jim



Tell Valerie "Hi".

[Sir]

Originally Posted by James Banta

It sure looked rhetorical to me and I ignored it. BUT if you need it answered, fine. This wasn't much if a question.. You asked "You "heard" that huh?" My answer is Yes.. Not from a anti source but directly from him.. You didn't see it sorry.. You should Pay attention! The rest of your statement here is nothing more than a personal attack and in ignored.. Except in a message I didn't think you would ignore.. IHS jim



Tell Valerie "Hi".

It wasn't a personal attack.

In fact......when you run to tattle on me to Jill, make sure you hit the REPORT ****on and not the REPUTATION ****on because then *I* get your tattle in MY Inbox!! LOL

(From my Inbox, with the same typos and everything. I think you meant this for Jill ):

Being called a child has made me unwill to deal wuth sir.. I ask you to make sure that none of us has to endure his insults..

By the way, you obviously did not read carefully that I said "your responses are representative of an elementary child". Notice I said your RESPONSES (not YOU) and I made it a simile, not calling you a child.

But LIKE A CHILD, you ran to tell mommy that your feelings got hurt.

Go figure.

[James Banta]

Originally Posted by Sir

It wasn't a personal attack.

In fact......when you run to tattle on me to Jill, make sure you hit the REPORT ****on and not the REPUTATION ****on because then *I* get your tattle in MY Inbox!! LOL

(From my Inbox, with the same typos and everything. I think you meant this for Jill ):



By the way, you obviously did not read carefully that I said "your responses are representative of an elementary child". Notice I said your RESPONSES (not YOU) and I made it a simile, not calling you a child.

But LIKE A CHILD, you ran to tell mommy that your feelings got hurt.

Go figure.

Nope not a word of this is a personal attack.. It's just something that you don't see coming from any of the Christians here.. IHS jim

[Pa Pa]

So were have are already doing same sex sealing?

[alanmolstad]

Originally Posted by James Banta

Nope not a word of this is a personal attack.. It's just something that you don't see coming from any of the Christians here.. IHS jim

Amen!

I looked over this topic and although Im not sure what it was really about underneath it all, for the most part I dont find too much here worth the time to have read.

[dberrie2000]

Originally Posted by James Banta

That is interesting.. Not discussing the rites of the temple may I ask you why being sealed to anyone is important at all?

Why would an eternal marriage in heaven be important?

Revelation 19:7-9---King James Version (KJV)
7 Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honour to him: for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath made herself ready.
8 And to her was granted that she should be arrayed in fine linen, clean and white: for the fine linen is the righteousness of saints.
9 And he saith unto me, Write, Blessed are they which are called unto the marriage supper of the Lamb. And he saith unto me, These are the true sayings of God.