Quote Originally Posted by disciple View Post
Hey NH,

Verse 8 specifies that the Son is being addressed. Jesus mentions this in Mat. 22:41-45
Mt 22

41 While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them,

42 Saying, What think ye of Christ? whose son is he? They say unto him, The son of David.

43 He saith unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying,

44 The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool?

45 If David then call him Lord, how is he his son?

??, you are quoting an obviously UNITARIAN verse to make what case?

The Lord (YHWH) said to my Lord (Jesus)....two Lords mentioned here.

So then you are a proponent of LORD Theology (my canned term) where LORD means GOD?? My view is exactly opposed. LORD can mean many things and Strongs Lexicon will support me. Any oddball trin or JisG terp here is gonna fall flat on it's face, not necessarily the TERP rather TERPER (can I say this even half-heartedly) and so then...WHY is the terp(er) falling flat on his face, em buhhhhhh......

....oh yeah since two Lords do not normally a one God make. Even in the old days, since they could ADD, goh.

('Goh' means GO to Truth, also my owned canned term). Goh hither fair damsel and the force I mean Lord be with you.