Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Harry Potter and the Occult

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    brisbenea
    Guest

    Default

    Its no surprise actually, with movies like harry porter. Many teems are trying to get involved in occult.

  2. #2
    Soldier4Truth
    Guest

    Default

    I agree with the main substance of "The Kingdom of the Occult,' but I have minor disagreements. For example, I would not cl***ify all clairvoyants as demonic (not sure the book does this). Many of our Orthodox saints and elders are clairvoyant, and can read souls and see their sins. This is a gift from God. Also, the book claims that Christians cannot be demon possessed, and I think they cite this p***age:

    "What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?" (1Corinthians 6:19).

    Just because the temple is of the Holy Ghost, doesn't prove that it cannot be possessed. The temple is also full of sin, yet the Holy Spirit dwells there to some degree. We can push the Holy Ghost away through our sins.

  3. #3
    alanmolstad
    Guest

    Default

    there is no support found in the bible for a christian being possessed......
    All the so-called proof is from outside the text.

    because there is no case of a Christian being possessed in the Bible, and because all the evidence that this does happen is from non-bible sources, I have to say that Mr Martin stands on a lot firmer ground on this question...

  4. #4

  5. #5
    Soldier4Truth
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alanmolstad View Post
    there is no support found in the bible for a christian being possessed......
    All the so-called proof is from outside the text.
    You have a misunderstanding of the nature of Scripture. It's a history of divine revelation. It does not claim to contain everything about spiritual life. We know Christians can be possessed. See this video. A man had a demon of pros***ution.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFiHIKxNius

    Protestants misinterpret biblical p***ages.

  6. #6
    alanmolstad
    Guest

    Default

    Im sure if you had any bible verses that even hinted such a teaching that you would be banging on pots and pans to tell me about them....

    however lacking any support in the text at all, people that are so invested in such ideas being true they will turn to downplaying the Bible's importance in the effort to raise up wild stories of personal experience.



    In my view, a story about a Christian being possessed should take its rightful place next to a stories about UFOs and BigFoot, as subjects whispered about a campfire....

  7. #7
    MacG
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Soldier4Truth View Post
    You have a misunderstanding of the nature of Scripture. It's a history of divine revelation. It does not claim to contain everything about spiritual life. We know Christians can be possessed. See this video. A man had a demon of pros***ution.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFiHIKxNius
    Demons for sure cannot tolerate praise in Jesus name, prayer in Jesus name but I failed to see where the young man in the story in the video was a Christian.

    Protestants misinterpret biblical p***ages.
    There aren't that many p***ages dealing with this topic. Feel free to post the relevant p***ages and how they are misinterpreted.

    MacG

  8. #8
    alanmolstad
    Guest

    Default

    so what Im saying is that there just is no real support for the idea that Christians can be possessed by the devil.
    In defending that idea the other side says, "But look at this video"

    So this comes down to a total lack of any support outside what can be seen in a video?

    A video is nice,...but is it proof?


    this sounds like when I was in grade school and there was another kid that said "Bigfoot was real"

    I told him that I read that at no place have they ever found a dead Bigfoot body rotting, nor any bones of long dead bodies, nor any fur, nor any real proof that you could take to a scientist to say this was a "Bigfoot" and nothing else..

    yet the kid answered and said, "But I saw a movie about it on TV"



    It seems that we have turned over the study of serious things to, movie makers?
    Last edited by alanmolstad; 03-12-2017 at 07:38 AM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •