are you saying that no amount of science will ever in even the next billion years ever understand how you can take a few cells from a person, and manipulate them in such a manner as to produce independent life?
are you saying that no amount of science will ever in even the next billion years ever understand how you can take a few cells from a person, and manipulate them in such a manner as to produce independent life?
As an after thought? NO!
how was man made to reproduce . or was he?
If not ,then was he created with cojones or not? If so, for what purpose?
Did Eve come first and then the cojones?
Or were their two dissections.
You can't bluff your way through this.
Hey, I want to ask you .. how do I put someone on a IGNORE MESSAGING ?
Can you instruct.. there's this **** bugging me ..
The answer is found at Genesis 1:28As an after thought? NO!
how was man made to reproduce . or was he?
If not ,then was he created with cojones or not? If so, for what purpose?
Did Eve come first and then the cojones?
Or were their two dissections.
You can't bluff your way through this.
Hey, I want to ask you .. how do I put someone on a IGNORE MESSAGING ?
Can you instruct.. there's this **** bugging me ..
From the get-go Adam was able to have kids....thus he was as much a male as any of us who came from him....
again the verse answers your question....from the get-go they were able to have kids.
There is a strong hint in the story that Adam suffered the loss of a rib, but I see nothing in the text to suggest that anything else was taken or added during this time.
So if anyone were to suggest that Adam was not created a normal "male" they would need to support this with Scripture....as there is none to support that idea, it fails.
the Bible does tell us clearly that the first "man" was Adam.
This is a good text-proof to support the idea that Adam was just created a normal male as are the children who stem from his loins.
Eve was not part of the original plan.. Only after Adam became lonely and needed a help mate did the rib become Eve.again the verse answers your question....from the get-go they were able to have kids.
There is a strong hint in the story that Adam suffered the loss of a rib, but I see nothing in the text to suggest that anything else was taken or added during this time.
So if anyone were to suggest that Adam was not created a normal "male" they would need to support this with Scripture....as there is none to support that idea, it fails.
the Bible does tell us clearly that the first "man" was Adam.
This is a good text-proof to support the idea that Adam was just created a normal male as are the children who stem from his loins.
So ,how was Adam to procreate if Eve had not been necessary. ? Answer the question without any B.S.
The answer is , was Adam told to have kids before Eve was introduced to him?......no.
before Adam or any man meets his wife we are not commanded to have children.
before I met my wife, I was still a male....I still had all the bits I would need.
So there is no support at all for the idea that Adam was any different than His future children.
Once again, that idea "Fails"
The idea does fail ,because the idea was allegorical from the get go. but good try!The answer is , was Adam told to have kids before Eve was introduced to him?......no.
before Adam or any man meets his wife we are not commanded to have children.
before I met my wife, I was still a male....I still had all the bits I would need.
So there is no support at all for the idea that Adam was any different than His future children.
Once again, that idea "Fails"
so there is nothing in the Genesis story that can not be taken very literal...
while it is true that we can find great hidden meanings in the events of the story, we also can find very real history too!