Oh, thats right, mans laws.
which is what I refrred to when I said that Smith's multiple marriages were against "THE" "LAW" "OF" "THE LAND", genius.
Show me the evidence partner, were they sealings or marriages? interesting that you fail to ever provide any evidence to back up you claims. Gosh, darn, it must be frustrating to find that your little anti books are so limited in helping you as you furiously flip the pages, cussing that you just can't find any evidence.
Again you pretend to draw a distinction between "marriage" and "sealing". The sources for Smith's many marriages are published (much to the discomfort of the LDS) in many books and all over the internet. Those reports are drawn from first-hand accounts of the participants and witnesses to Smith's many marriages.
Well good buddy, where are all the children that would make your point valid.
Logical fallacy: Argument from silence. First of all, there need not be children resulting from every marriage. Secondly, there are those who SELF-proclaim as being children of your "prophet", as well as DNA research that has allowed for at least a few such children - though you will predictably just beg more questions regarding them, so what's the point?
No Brian, the challenge is back at you, you made the claim of marrying other mens wives, so with that definition good buddy, would that not mean sexual relations also.
"The only men who become Gods, even the sons of God, are those who enter into polygamy" (Journal of Discourses 11:269)
Whom shall we believe ...YOU or LDS "prophet" Brigham Young?
-BH
.