You "heard" that huh?
You "heard" that huh?
Oath formerly taken by Mormons promising not to reveal secret Mormon temple rituals: "Should we do so, we agree to have our breasts cut open and our hearts and vitals torn from our bodies and given to the birds of the air and the beasts of the field."
Osteen or Smith. IHS jim
I forgot I need to keep it really simple here.
You said, "I don't want to stray from mormonism here too far but I heard Osteen deny the Lord on national tv."
I said, "You heard that huh?"
So obviously I am questioning that you heard Osteen deny the Lord.
Ok then there is no question is there.. IHS jim
Actually, yes, it was a question. In English, when a question is formed, it is followed by a symbol like this "?". For example, in your above statement, you probably should've put a "?" given the structure of your comment is normal for a question.
I also explained that I was asking about what you heard.
If you want to read it as a rhetorical question in which you don't need to answer, that's fine.
If you simply don't have an answer and cannot back up your claim, that's fine too.
At this point, I can tell that having an intelligent conversation with you is futile since obviously your responses are representative of an elementary child. I did try to keep it as simple as I could, but even then one cannot expect everyone to understand simple things.
Tell Valerie "Hi".
It sure looked rhetorical to me and I ignored it. BUT if you need it answered, fine. This wasn't much if a question.. You asked "You "heard" that huh?" My answer is Yes.. Not from a anti source but directly from him.. You didn't see it sorry.. You should Pay attention! The rest of your statement here is nothing more than a personal attack and in ignored.. Except in a message I didn't think you would ignore.. IHS jimActually, yes, it was a question. In English, when a question is formed, it is followed by a symbol like this "?". For example, in your above statement, you probably should've put a "?" given the structure of your comment is normal for a question.
I also explained that I was asking about what you heard.
If you want to read it as a rhetorical question in which you don't need to answer, that's fine. If you simply don't have an answer and cannot back up your claim, that's fine too.
At this point, I can tell that having an intelligent conversation with you is futile since obviously your responses are representative of an elementary child. I did try to keep it as simple as I could, but even then one cannot expect everyone to understand simple things.
Tell Valerie "Hi".
It wasn't a personal attack.It sure looked rhetorical to me and I ignored it. BUT if you need it answered, fine. This wasn't much if a question.. You asked "You "heard" that huh?" My answer is Yes.. Not from a anti source but directly from him.. You didn't see it sorry.. You should Pay attention! The rest of your statement here is nothing more than a personal attack and in ignored.. Except in a message I didn't think you would ignore.. IHS jim
Tell Valerie "Hi".
In fact......when you run to tattle on me to Jill, make sure you hit the REPORT ****on and not the REPUTATION ****on because then *I* get your tattle in MY Inbox!! LOL
(From my Inbox, with the same typos and everything. I think you meant this for Jill ):
By the way, you obviously did not read carefully that I said "your responses are representative of an elementary child". Notice I said your RESPONSES (not YOU) and I made it a simile, not calling you a child.Being called a child has made me unwill to deal wuth sir.. I ask you to make sure that none of us has to endure his insults..
But LIKE A CHILD, you ran to tell mommy that your feelings got hurt.
Go figure.
Last edited by Sir; 07-11-2013 at 12:04 AM.
Nope not a word of this is a personal attack.. It's just something that you don't see coming from any of the Christians here.. IHS jimIt wasn't a personal attack.
In fact......when you run to tattle on me to Jill, make sure you hit the REPORT ****on and not the REPUTATION ****on because then *I* get your tattle in MY Inbox!! LOL
(From my Inbox, with the same typos and everything. I think you meant this for Jill ):
By the way, you obviously did not read carefully that I said "your responses are representative of an elementary child". Notice I said your RESPONSES (not YOU) and I made it a simile, not calling you a child.
But LIKE A CHILD, you ran to tell mommy that your feelings got hurt.
Go figure.
So were have are already doing same sex sealing?
Amen!
I looked over this topic and although Im not sure what it was really about underneath it all, for the most part I dont find too much here worth the time to have read.
Why would an eternal marriage in heaven be important?
Revelation 19:7-9---King James Version (KJV)
7 Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honour to him: for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath made herself ready.
8 And to her was granted that she should be arrayed in fine linen, clean and white: for the fine linen is the righteousness of saints.
9 And he saith unto me, Write, Blessed are they which are called unto the marriage supper of the Lamb. And he saith unto me, These are the true sayings of God.