What the Jews got right they got so right. And what the Jews got wrong they got so wrong.

They did not fully consider the evidence they had before them in the Tanakh in matters regarding the resurrection of the Messiah (forging the false Messiah ben David / Messiah ben Joseph interpretations) for some p***ages spoke of his reigning forever and others of his sacrificial death for the many... neglecting to consider *** 19:23-28 putting the two apparent impossibilities into one possibility they'd not considered.

My point in the posting you refer to is that if what you say about the Jewish interpretation of the shma were actually true... then why would RAMBAM ever see the need to tamper with the text in the first place?


Quote Originally Posted by reinart View Post
Funny the Jews rejected this idea totally and can be found in and on about everything they write on the p***age.
elohienu was plural for the Majesty, Power, knowledge of God, not for a plurality of persons, for other than some liberal Kabbalist types, the Hebrews denied what you are stating.

Now Echad must not be a word you have researched, but by Trinitarian writers who seem to have blinders on, as the word is not ONLY a word that is pluralized, but that some approx. 903 times(per Oneness author Keith Morehead of Fictional Foundations of Trinitarian Thought)Echad was used in O.T. is singular one in describing whatever it is modifying and for the majority is only singular and by far the most and only a handful of words plural.
Again, the Jews did not hold what you are stating and if you are only relying on gentile Trinity scholars you will be following a errant view from people who had this book and knowledge of those words contrary to their own thinking and what God entrusted to them.


One must ask, DT. 6:4 SPEAKS OF ONE WHAT?, it is One God. And Jesus in the N.T. MK. 12:29-32 is speaking of 'one' heis God Theos, and that by Grammar means God is , one person. one personality, one man. {God is not a man, but used for single being).
Whether a late comer tried to insert yachid into the p***age or not it wasn't actually needed, as the following show.
The following usages for example Gen. 2:21, Gen. 22:2,Num. 13:23.