But...when you turn and read about the events of the 4th day, does it not say God made the sun on that day?
Nope.
But does not not clearly say god "also made"the stars on the 4thday?
Nope.
But in my Bible it says ,and I quote :"
16 God made two great lights—the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars." so does that not prove 100% that God made both the sun and moon on the 4th day as well as the stars?
nope.
Why not?
The answer is that the writer of Genesis is careful to not say that the "sun" or that the "moon" was created on the 4thday.
Notice we are only talking about the introduction of the "greater" and the "lesser" light.
Greater and lesser are AMOUNTS of light.
So the writer of genesis is talking about a change in the amount of light that is seen on the earth on the 4th day, and the writer of genesis also goes out of his way to make sure we dont think the sun and moon are created on this day by not using the words 'sun"and "moon"in what he is talking about.
So the sun nor the moon is said to be made on the 4th day.
But it says the 'stars' are made on the 4th day?
Nope
But I just quoted the verse and it says in black and white "
also made the stars"
Nope, that is not actually what the Hebrew text says there....
Its not in the Hebrew?
Nope,just look at the verse in a translation that will put the added words in brackets[] that tell us what words are there and what were added later by an editor.
http://genius.com/Holy-bible-kjv-genesis-1-annotated
so the words that teach that the stars were made on the 4thday do not appear in the text but were just simply added?
yes.