Did the same guys ever claim that this meant we are to understand the whole book of Enoch is inspired and equal with scriptures? .......the answer is no.


My point is that writers throughout church history have used different sources to make different arguments.
While some people today try to make a big deal over the fact that a writer quoted from Enoch, they seem to skip-over the fact that many non-inspired books are quoted within the text of the Bible.

The earrly church writers felt free to do this.
They felt free to use whatever source they wanted as long as it worked to help their arguments..

So when we read such quotations taken out of non-inspired works we must do so with the knowledge that this use of a book of Enoch quotations does not mean for one moment that the writer is supporting the entire work as being equal to the Bible.