RGS,
You wrote:
Yes, it was.
1) What I say is much more likely to be true than what you say. That is for two reasons: 1) anti-Catholics are more likely to post falsehoods if it advances their cause, and 2) anti-Catholics are less likely to get things right because they care little about the truth.
It is relevant. After all the rest of the context of that section and the other quotes from St. Athanasius show what he meant - and what he meant is NOT what you claim.
1) It is VERY relevant that he was quoted. If he wasn't quoted then the quote would not have appeared at all.
2) He is a saint. He is perfected. You're not.
There was no heresy. There was only your dishonest attempt to twist what Athanasius clearly meant according to the context of his writings.
Neither did Athanasius - when you read what he wrote in the proper context.
And that has nothing to do with what we're talking about since St. Athanasius wasn't claiming what you falsely claim he did.
BWA HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Your conclusion is meaningless. 1) You're objectively wrong as every scholar - including every Protestant scholar of any repute - knows. They know what St. Athanasius meant. 2) Anti-Catholics, who routinely post falsehoods and make ridiculous errors, are in no position to conclude anything about the Catholic Church.
Maybe that's why so few people take note of your posts?