Originally Posted by
Sir
I am not sure why you are having a hard time understanding me, except I believe that it is so obvious that you have to dis***ociate yourself with it in order to try and make sense of it.
In a nutshell, your only recourse is to claim that since Jesus never sinned, no matter what he did was not a sin. So in the case James banta makes, ***ume that both you and Jesus were 'selfish' as newborns and cried for your mother's attention. To state that it is a serious sin for you to do it but not a sin for Jesus to do it makes no logical sense. Either both are guilty of the 'serious sin' or neither one is. But it can't be that one is right and one is wrong when doing the same thing.
being given care as was the case for Jesus is not the same thing as demanding care as we did as infants.. Jesus is said had no sin.. Because of that He never demanded anything even as a infant.. I claim the Bible in this matter you can claim your own thought if you wish Scripture in more authoritative..
2 Cor 5:21
For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.
There seems to be a lot about the scripture that you just can't, or won't, accept.. IHS jim