Saturday, March 24, 2007

Response to Greg Johnson, President, Standing Together Ministries

Well, things have certainly gotten a bit lively around here in my absence. For all of you who may not know Greg Johnson, he and Richard Mouw (of Let’s Celebrate Joseph Smith’s Birthday! fame) are single-handedly responsible for organizing the disaster that took place at the Mormon Tabernacle in 2004.

I thought I would answer his comments in my regular blog, since he represents the core group defending Dr. Hazen. My response is as follows (spelling errors are verbatim):

Greg: Mrs. Rische, the reason you know me is because of an historic outreach with Ravi Zacharias at the Mormon Taberancle.

Jill: Unfortunately Greg, this is true.


Greg: The reason I know of you is because you have spoken about me to others and because some of those people have told me some of the things you have said about me.

Jill: Greg, you publicly attacked The Kingdom of the Cults in the Salt Lake City press. The comments I made about you were public comments in response to your attack. I don’t know what other “comments” you mean.

Greg: You post against a fine and godly frined of mine, Dr. Craig Hazen, makes this as good a time as any for us to finally communicate directly to each other, although a more biblical model of communication might have been in order before now, don't you think?

Jill: If you had something against me personally, you are right in saying you should have come to me personally. I had nothing personally against you or against Craig.

You made negative public statements against The Kingdom of the Cults and I responded publicly to them. As a Christian teacher, you fall under this Scripture: “Let not many of you become teachers, knowing that we shall receive a stricter judgment.” James 3:1-2. You are accountable to the body of Christ for your actions. Matthew 18—read in context—refers to personal offenses.

I didn't take your criticism personally (since my father is always being criticized)--even though you refused to apologize for your comments.

Greg: Where do we begin? For some reason, I guess you feel the need to wear the mantle of your father's ministry, to take up where you feel he left off.

Jill: Yes . . . all the death threats against my father, our house being bugged, bomb threats, character attacks . . . all this would make me choose to wear his mantle.

I am doing what God called me to do. His opinion is the only one that matters.

Greg: Mrs. Rische, I knew you father, as a young man in ministry, I met him several times during my high school and college days at Westmont College. I had several personal meetings with him and even hosted him at Westmont College in 1987. It was an honor for me to attend his funeral service in 1989. Mrs. Rische, from what I have heard of you, I must share with you that you are no Walter Martin.

Jill: Belittling me is the best you can do in defense of Craig Hazen? Greg, we have you on tape slamming Walter Martin at one of your many confusing talks on Mormonism. Why you continue to claim you knew him well and he meant something to you is beyond me. You were an acquaintance of my father--that's all. He never mentioned a Greg Vettel Johnson . . . ever.


I have no wish to be Walter Martin, so your comment doesn't hurt me, Greg. I am his daughter, and that is enough.

Greg: I can recall fondly, a time with your dad at the Santa Barbara airport. I asked him how he dealt with critics but more importantly how he dealt with professing Christians who attacked him and who never tried to speak directly with him first to resolve a matter of conflict or disagreement. His words were profend then, they remain so to this day, and I will always live by them. He said to me with great focus, "Young man, it is like my old mentor, Dr. Donald Gray Barnhouse, use to say to me, 'be ye so busy with the work of the Lord that you do not have time to throw stones at the barking dogs along the path.'"

Jill: You quote my father to attack me, his daughter? You claim some kind of close relationship to a man you publicly detest, in order to give yourself a false authority? Here’s what my father has to say about your tactics, Greg.

Walter Martin: “If someone insults my wife and my children, it upsets me. If they insult my country, it upsets me. And if somebody bastardizes my Savior, I’m really upset!”

You seem upset with me, Greg, but you don’t seem very upset with the Mormons.

You and Richard Mouw are fond of using Barnhouse against Walter Martin and his family, but Barnhouse characterized men like you (compromisers) as “appalling.” You can read all about it here:

The Late Walter Martin’s Daughter Takes on Her Father’s Critic:
http://www.christianworldviewnetwork.com/article.php/1271/Jill_Martin_Rische

Greg: You behavior since before the days of Ravi's address at the Mormon Tabernacle in SLC, it was not a Rich Mouw meeting by the way but a Ravi Zacharias meeting (you obviously have listened to the DVD or CD and must have noted this) has been most unimpressive.

Jill: This doesn’t make much sense to me, but I think you’re insulting me again. Not good strategy . . . please answer the charge of blasphemy.

Greg: I am confident that you have not honored your father's legacy by your unkind assertions against Christian leaders such as Drs. Mouw and Hazen.

Jill: My father would have dissected the Mouw/Hazen methodology in about 5 minutes flat. He would have called them what they are: compromisers in alliance with men who preach blasphemy.

Greg: To my knowledge you have not spoken against Ravi's message at the Tabernacle, nor have I heard you offer praise for its annointing, boldness, and proclamation of truth, and this is so very sad.

Jill: Ravi is an excellent speaker. His first three points were very bold. Jesus as “absolute truth” was relative, though, since the Mormon definition of Jesus was never discussed.

Greg: You call The Evening of Friendship a Mormon/evangelical worship service? How so?

Jill: You prayed together in a Tabernacle built for the god of Joseph Smith. Who were you praying to? Would God hear prayers offered in the house of Satan? You sang worship songs led by a Christian artist, Michael Card (who needs a thorough lesson in theology). You listened to a sermon and closed in prayer. Sounds like a worship service to me.

Greg: Do non-believers ever attend your local church? Do they sit in the pews? Might they actually sing along during the praise time? If so, are your local church services acts of blasphamy? Of course they are not!

Jill: Where do I start? First you question it was a worship service—then you say there’s nothing wrong with it if it was! You think Christians worshiping in the temple of antichrist is the same as Christians worshiping with the lost in the house of God? The Christians were guests of the Mormons–there is a difference.


Mormons hold Christian beliefs to be an abomination, so you shared a stage and worshiped with people who day in and day out work to destroy the Kingdom of God. I have a big problem with that.

Greg: The Tabernacle event was completely in the hands of evangelical leaders who offered the prayers, led the singing, and who preached the Word of God in might and power, just like D.L. Moody did in 1899.

Jill: You worshiped in the Tabernacle of a false god--an idol. “Do not be unequally yoked together with unbelievers. For what fellowship has righteousness with lawlessness? And what communion has light with darkness? And what accord has Christ with Belial? Or what part has a believer with an unbeliever? And what agreement has the temple of God with idols?” 1 Cor 6:14 Seems pretty clear to me.

Your argument is with the apostle Paul. In the world of the Roman Empire, some people in the Church compromised with pagan religions. Paul rebuked them and it applies to Hazen/Johnson/Mouw two thousand years later.

Greg: I am confident Mrs. Rische that had I been able to extend such an invitation to Walter Martin to preach a gospel message at the Mormon Tablernacle on Temple Square that he would have done it and would have done so to the glory of Jesus Christ!

Jill: My father could not even stand outside the Mormon Tabernacle. He left Salt Lake City without ever going inside of it because he couldn’t tolerate the spiritual smell of "sulphur" emanating from it. He would have turned you down flat and done everything he could to stop such a disaster from occurring.

Greg, I wouldn’t presume to tell you what your parent would do. I find it odd that you, a virtual stranger to my father, are “confident” you know him so well.

Greg: The event at the Tabernacle was a blessing from the Lord and I believe He was honored and pleased by it.

Jill: “Do not be unequally yoked together with unbelievers. For what fellowship has righteousness with lawlessness? And what communion has light with darkness? And what accord has Christ with Belial? Or what part has a believer with an unbeliever? And what agreement has the temple of God with idols?”

For you are the temple of the living God.
As God has said: "I will dwell in them And walk among them.
I will be their God, And they shall be My people."
Therefore

"Come out from among them And be separate, says the Lord.
Do not touch what is unclean,
And I will receive you.
"I will be a Father to you,
And you shall be My sons and daughters,
Says the LORD Almighty." 2 Cor 6:14-18


Defend your position biblically, Greg. What you believe is irrelevant if Scripture contradicts it.

Greg: So, because I see the pattern here that I have seen with others who once considered me a young crusader in the anti-mormon cause, I close skeptical that you will hear my heart in these words. I shall though take your father's grand advice to me once again and stay busy in the work that the Lord has called me to do.

Jill: “Anti-mormon cause?” I believe Christians call that evangelism. You sound like a Mormon, Greg. Perhaps you should have listened to the people who cared enough about you to tell you that you are in error.

Greg: Will you continue to bark at Dr. Hazen (even after he has sought to meet personally with you and your husband to discuss the matters of your concern?) and other good folks who are serving the Lord in our heart to reach into a community of people we love with the truth of Jesus Christ? I sure hope not.

Jill: Insulting me repeatedly doesn't help your cause, Greg. Ad hominem is a low form of argument. As to Craig Hazen, we talked to him via email and we offered to talk to him on the telephone, but he refused. He insisted we drive an hour and a half to Biola to sit down and talk face to face with him, even though we had less than 10 days before we were scheduled to move across the country.

The truth of the matter is this: MANY Christian leaders went to Craig Hazen and tried—in vain—to persuade him of his error. He refused to listen to any of them. We tried talking to him, he did not listen to us.

After refusing to speak to us on the telephone, Craig sent a nasty email behind our backs full of “unkind” comments. Again, this did not personally upset me since the ministry is not a popularity contest, and I was used to insults; I had to learn to deal with them at a very young age. However, I may just post all of our correspondence with Craig, since he broke confidentiality and seems to be portraying events inaccurately.

Yes, I suppose you will keep speaking at FAIR conferences, Greg, and having lunch with Robert Millet. Here is proof of what you’ve accomplished:


"My sister is deeply into Mormonism & went to the program in the Tabernacle. Her comments were:

'It was wonderful. Now I see that we are Christians and there is no opposition. Several people from my congregation went.'


"I commented to her that I thought her churches were called "wards" and she said, 'They call them congregations now....'"*

*Emphasis added, http://www.mormoninfo.org/index.php?id=130 (accessed March 24, 2007).


Memorable Greg Johnson Quote:

“We are trying to show the upcoming generation that we don't have to be confrontational on truth," Johnson said, "There is a lot of room for us to build on our compromise of scriptures."


Please don't say I misquoted you, Greg. The reporter stated she had it on tape.
See http://www.mormoninfo.org/index.php?id=153 (accessed March 23, 2007) emphasis added.


Jill Martin Rische
Walter Martin Ministries

27 Comments:

Blogger Jeff said...

I'm not comfortable with this part of the exchange...

Greg: You post against a fine and godly frined of mine, Dr. Craig Hazen, makes this as good a time as any for us to finally communicate directly to each other, although a more biblical model of communication might have been in order before now, don't you think?

Jill: If you had something against me personally, you’re right in saying you should have come to me personally.

You made negative public statements against The Kingdom of the Cults, Greg. I responded publicly to them. As a Christian teacher, you fall under this Scripture: “Let not many of you become teachers, knowing that we shall receive a stricter judgment.” James 3:1-2. You are accountable to the body of Christ for your actions. Matthew 18—read in context—refers to personal offenses.


I don't know the full situation regarding who communicated with who, or who had something wrong with who, personally, etc.

It seems though that Jill has something again Greg and Craig...whether right or wrong, at the moment is not the issue. Although we can easily see why Jill would have had, and did/does have, a problem with both gentlemen.

Point being, it doesn't seem as though Craig should take all the blame for not contacting Jill, as a sister in the Lord to try to at least clear personal air...whether in the end you agree on methodology or not.

More could be said and probably will.

7:51 PM  
Blogger Jill Martin Rische said...

Jeff,

You should see in my comments that Kevin and I did talk to Craig. As to Greg, I answered his public comments publicly. After that, I did not hold a grudge--even though Greg refused to apologize for his negative comments.

Jill

10:32 PM  
Blogger Matthew said...

This post has been removed by the author.

11:16 PM  
Blogger Jill Martin Rische said...

Well said, Matthew.

Thanks for posting.

Jill

11:40 PM  
Blogger Matthew said...

This post has been removed by the author.

2:02 AM  
Blogger JohnD said...

Good to see the acorn didn't fall far from the tree, Jill! LOL

Truth has fact on it's side which is why the deluded must be so practiced and so devoted to their delusion to remain deluded. I am convinced it is a psychosis... and I am appalled by the high percentage of psychotics there are in the human race.

Hang in there and keep swinging!

JohnD

7:19 AM  
Blogger Martin James said...

I am sitting here reading all of this and this is what I see.

We have a bunch of "big name" scholars who, in the name of fairness / dialogue / evangelism, have really become watered down, feeling oriented and compromising.

I didn’t know Walter Martin, other than (like so many people) reading and listening to him. I think Jill is doing what her father would be doing: Blowing the whistle on the people who are willing to jump into bed with unbelievers.

7:48 AM  
Blogger Greg said...

Jill,

Let me apologize for the spelling errors in my reply and for the offences I've caused you. Because of my admiration of Craig Hazen I was quick to offer a reply to your blog about him. My words should have been more tempered and I should not have contrasted you against your father. I apologize to you and I am sorry. I ask for your forgiveness.

God Bless,

Rev. Gregory Johnson
Standing Together, President

10:15 AM  
Blogger Martin James said...

I can't get this issue out of my mind. Mormons are POLYTHISTS. They believe MONOTHISTS ARE WRONG. How can mature Christian leaders be saying what they are saying when they know MORMONS ARE POLYTHISTS? The answer is that they believe in a man centered gospel… which is a false gospel.

I am witnessing apostasy right before my eyes?

3:11 AM  
Blogger Francis J. Beckwith said...

This post has been removed by the author.

8:55 PM  
Blogger Dwayna Litz said...

Jill, the quotes from Hazen and Greg Johnson speak volumes. The spirit at work is very plain to me.

To Francis Beckwith, I have listened and listened to you on CD and given out articles you have written astutely to win the lost to Jesus...I am shocked. I have always thought of you as a great apologist. Great apologists don't give ad homenim attacks, especially toward someone bold enough to make a stand for the Bible and be hated and misunderstood (not only with the Mormons but also with "leaders" in Christianity) for such a stand.

I have prayed for your ministry many times as I have listened to you give excellent lectures on tape. But, I am someone you will probably never meet, and my thoughts--or your testimony now to my life--may not really matter to you at all. I will pray tonight to the ONE who is the Lover of My Soul about it. Nothing shocks Him. People are not who they appear to be. Maybe I expect people to die to self and live for Jesus too easily, especially when it comes to Christian "leaders." I think it would behoove us to stop and think about how God views people and realize that when we get Home in heaven the true leaders there may very well be people we have never heard of here on earth.

In a previous post, I said to Greg Johnson, "You are no Walter Martin." I have honestly asked God to forgive me for making that personal attack (because to me that was quite an insult given how much I respect the life of Walter Martin). For that, I apologize. God will judge, and His Spirit does not lie.

10:23 PM  
Blogger Dwayna Litz said...

"I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and the cleverness of the clever I will set aside. Where is the wise man? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world?"

"For consider your calling, brethren, that there were not many wise according to the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble; but God has chosen the foolish things of the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen the weak things of the world to shame the things which are strong...that no man should boast before God."

--1 Cor. 1:19-20, 26-29

11:03 PM  
Blogger Matthew said...

This post has been removed by the author.

11:39 PM  
Blogger Francis J. Beckwith said...

Dwayna:

I appreciate your kind words. However, you are mistaken about the ad hominen fallacy. It is not the ad hominem fallacy to suggest to someone that he or she is not exhibiting Christian virtue at times where such virtues are required. It would be the ad hominem fallacy if I argued that a lack of virtue shows that the argument offered by that person is unsound or weak. But that is precisely what I did not do. What I did was suggest that Jill interpret the public comments of her brothers charitably. I understand that this can be difficult, for I am as guilty as anyone of not abiding by this principle on many occasions.

The questions I raised are perfectly legitimate in the context of free church American Protestantism. Jill appealed to "Christian leaders" as authoritative in the matter of Craig's visit to Salt Lake City several years ago. But if one believes in sola scriptura, the priesthood of all believers, the autonomy of the local church, and private interpretation of Scripture then there really is no reason why anyone, let alone Craig Hazen, Richard Mouw, or Francis Beckwith should pay attention to a woman in Minneapolis with a keyboard, a monitor, a website, and a server.

I can see why some people, like you and Jill, think that Craig was wrong in what he did. Your position is not unreasonable. But it is not obviously true, and one can easily make a case that what Craig did was a public overture of Christian virtue to those he wants to reach for the Gospel. At some point one has to trust the Holy Spirit to do his work in the hearts of those we seek to bring into the Body of Christ. That is the way I look at Craig's actions. I could be wrong, to be sure. But knowing what I know about Craig and the work that he has done, I am confident in my assessment.

Francis J. Beckwith
http://francisbeckwith.com

9:50 AM  
Blogger Dwayna Litz said...

Greg:

Thanks so much for apologizing for your spelling errors. We, as Christians, bought by the BLOOD of Jesus, often judge one another’s merit before God based on spelling. :-) You know, there is a great big world out there made up of people who can spell and people who cannot spell, and—I hope you are sitting down for this—God loves them ALL THE SAME. God cares more about the heart than He does someone’s spelling. Do they teach the students that at Biola? I hope they don't leave that very important lesson out. Ah, what a sweet rumination. What a marvelous, loving God.

God’s ways are not man’s ways (Isaiah 55:8-11)

“You thought that I was just like you.” Ps. 50:21

“The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom. A good understanding have all those who do His commandments.” Psalm 111:10

“Stop regarding man whose breath of life is in his nostrils. For why should he be esteemed?” Isaiah 2:22

11:44 AM  
Blogger Dwayna Litz said...

Francis: one thing I have learned from you is that as thinking, rational human beings, we can all make judgments. I love telling that to someone in street ministry when they call me "judgmental," realizing that they have just made a judgment on me. :-)

That being said, thank you for your reply. But, still, the "mom and pop apologetics outfit" comment--though you have a right to it as a thinking, rational human being--was a comment strickly based on your own opinion, given the fact that BASED ON SCRIPTURE, you cannot prove that Craig Hazen's ministry, given his standing at Biola, is any more important to God than Jill and Kevin's ministry at Walter Martin Ministries. It was not judging someone according to the Spirit, but according to the flesh. We are commanded to make judgments according to the Spirit in the Bible.

Jill has brought to the light something that needs to be known. God is the God of light, and He is not the god of secrets. Unless we can see that a brother or sister in the Lord has done something which goes against Scripture, we have to be careful to not bear false witness...which brings me to one final point:

People like you might say that Craig has not done anything against Scripture in what has been documented here concerning his actions with the Mormons.(However, the Bible still reads the same :-) And people like you may fault Jill for writing these articles, etc., saying she is "misjudging"...BUT AT THE SAME TIME, YOU ARE CASTING A JUDGMENT ON JILL, STRICTLY BASED ON YOUR OWN OPINION (the very thing she is being "accused" of doing toward Hazen), WHEN SHE HAS DONE NOTHING AGAINST SCRIPTURE.

CRAIG HAZEN HAS DONE A LOT AGAINST SCRIPTURE. WHY IS THERE NOT MORE EMPHASIS ON THAT?

I would much rather debate a matter based on what the Bible teaches, giving Scriptures as answers on a topic such as this, but, it just so happens, from a logical standpoint, the criticisms toward Jill are weak.

12:15 PM  
Blogger oaMission said...

Greg: You post against a fine and godly frined of mine, Dr. Craig Hazen, makes this as good a time as any for us to finally communicate directly to each other, although a more biblical model of communication might have been in order before now, don't you think?

Apparently Greg Johnson thinks that this biblical mandate is a ONE WAY Street.
Standing together used the Street Preachers at General Conference as a springboard for News media coverage in SLC and onward to bigger & better things. He never approached any of the SP's before going to the media.

2:32 PM  
Blogger Francis J. Beckwith said...

Dwayna writes:

"But, still, the "mom and pop apologetics outfit" comment--though you have a right to it as a thinking, rational human being--was a comment strickly based on your own opinion, given the fact that BASED ON SCRIPTURE, you cannot prove that Craig Hazen's ministry, given his standing at Biola, is any more important to God than Jill and Kevin's ministry at Walter Martin Ministries. It was not judging someone according to the Spirit, but according to the flesh. We are commanded to make judgments according to the Spirit in the Bible."

Please reread my comments carefully. I did not make any claim about the superiority of one ministry over the other. What I did was raise a series of questions having to do with Jill's claim that Hazen had done wrong by not acquiescing to those critical of the Salt Lake City event. If Scripture is incapable of giving us direction here--as you seem to admit--then Jill is in precisely the same position as Craig, which means that she is no better than him and thus is not in a position to issue public pronouncements about him.

By the way, you should not have reposted Craig's private correspondence to a pastor with whom he sought counsel after you had agreed to take it down. The fact that you co-operated with the disclosure of private correspondence is simply indefensible. Without such zones of privacy in our lives, we cannot be open and candid with friends within the confines of confidence. Your disrespect for that relationship lacks charity, and thus, is unChristian.

Craig has told this minister that he conducted his correspondence with the belief that it was a private correspondence between parishoner and clergy. The minister, the other party to the communication, agreed and asked you to take it down. You agreed, did it, and then reposted it because you claimed that God told you otherwise. So, instead of defending the morality of the act, you appealed to the authority of God. But if the act is moral, then you don't need to appeal to God. The rightness of the act would be plain. On the other hand, if the act is immoral, then God's authority can't help you, for the wrongness of the act would be plain. So, God's authority is superfluous in this, which means that you have used his authority, his name, in vain.

Francis J. Beckwith
http://francisbeckwith.com

3:14 PM  
Blogger Rob said...

As for clarification of the tape of Greg making that "compromise" statement, my soon-to-be mother-in-law is the editor of the BYU NewsNet, and she told me that they no longer have the tape. She claimed the reporters listen to it to verify what was said, and then she said that it appeared Greg was attempting to do a "CYA" [Cover Your Anterior] with his clarification. I need to post this information on the MormonInfo.org page you cited.

Rob Sivulka
www.MormonInfo.org

3:59 PM  
Blogger Dwayna Litz said...

Francis:

I am not ashamed of posting Craig's comments (toward Jill and Kevin at WM Ministries mainly) on my blog one bit. It was never a personal letter--he sent it to a pastor to send to me without even addressing it to my name, and it was far from personal. I would have been more than happy to take it down if he had apologized about the condescending content, but he never did. Not only that, but he wrote me threatening to get the "Biola counsel involved". I did nothing wrong, given the fact that we still have freedom of speech in this country, and I had every right to post that letter for the discretion of other Christians.

As for your comment about Jill's ministry being a "mom-and-pop" organization, I guess it would be between you and the Lord as to whether you meant it condescendingly. It certainly came across that way to me, and, yes, that would be judging according to the flesh. The Lord does not measure the worth of a ministry based on its "size" in the world's eyes.

10:26 AM  
Blogger Dwayna Litz said...

This post has been removed by the author.

10:26 AM  
Blogger Jeff said...

As for your comment about Jill's ministry being a "mom-and-pop" organization, I guess it would be between you and the Lord as to whether you meant it condescendingly.

I'm not sure how Beckwith was using "mom-and-Pop", but this is has been a discussion with EMNR (or CC min. in general), when John Morehead became president. There are those in the Countercult community who would use the term about themselves, but are not being condescending toward themselves. The term has been used to distinguish a more academic apologetic from a street-fighter (another term used) apologetic. Those on both sides have used the terms to describe themselves.

10:58 AM  
Blogger Dwayna Litz said...

Jeff:

Here is how he used it:

"Again, where is it written that you are the gatekeeper of orthodoxy in the world of Christendom? Dr. Hazen, I believe, attends a conservative Friends church in Placentia, California. Why should he listen to the opinions of a mom-and-pop apologetics outfit that has a blog?"

11:01 AM  
Blogger Jeff said...

Perhap he used it the way you think he did. But, it wasn't as though he was saying this in isolation. He was making a larger point:

Dr. Hazen is a Christian leader too. And so is Greg Johnson. And so is Ravi Zacharias. And so is Richard Mouw. And so am I. Why should I believe you and the unnamed other leaders you did not list? Why should any of us consider them more authoritative on the subject of Mormon/Christian relations than the ones I listed above? Is there a Protestant magisterium the rest of us don't know about?

He seems to be wanting Jill to think through what she is saying about authorities, and that her arguement is foolish, given the way she is arguing.

BTW: I'm not saying she or what she said was foolish...just trying to clear up with Dr. Beckwith was getting at.

My point in my last post regarding about "mom-and-pop" stands. Mom-and-pop organization (the way it has been used) refer to those organiztion who are members of EMNR, although not limited to EMNR members.

11:22 AM  
Blogger Vernon said...

unbelievable... how can brothers and sisters, supposedly in the Lord, argue so churlishly (look it up) with each other? If Walter Martin's legacy, such as it is, is to continue to be effective in leading others to the one, true God of this universe, then any and all people - relatives, friends or associates - really should see the BIG picture. Shall utterly petty, acrimonious and UNLOVING judgment be bandied about on a public "Blog" so unwisely??

Personally, and candidly, a "time out" is in order. Everybody involved should be ashamed if they have not yet repented and forgiven their adversary(ies), and are ready to move on.

Speaking of the BIG PICTURE, the fact that Ravi Zacharias was able to enter the very epicenter of Mormon theology - the Tabernacle - and speak on the subject of grace, which is anathema to Mormon theology, is a miracle.

I don't know Walter Martin or his daughter, but I've read much of "Kingdom of the Cults" with the forward by Zacharias. I frankly don't see how his daughter can't grasp the profound significance of the fact that Zacharias' service/sermon/presentation in the Tabernacle in 2004 was like penetrating the very fortress of Mormonism and helping to start a cancer - in this case "benevolent" cancer - that will eventually help tear down the stronghold of this cult. The beauty, irony and perfection of that moment is apparently invisible to anybody blinded by what could be called an overdose of righteousness??? I dunno... but I do know that it is written that one should remove the log from their own eye before trying to remove the speck from the eye of another.

It is clear from Martin's editorializing in "Kindom of the Cults" that he has little patience or tolerance for the anti-thetical, non-Christian cults of the world. And that is OK by me, and his passion for pure Christianity is commendable. I don't believe that he, were he alive, would fail to appreciate the awesome opportunity to directly chip away at the stronghold of Mormonism in and through Zacharias' sermon on Grace in the Tabernacle in 2004.

It's simply too magnificent and powerful an irony for those with spiritual vision to miss.

I could probably come up with a few additional choice parables or analogies (modern-day) to further illuminate this last point, but to have to do so is uneconomical and actually the thought that some can't see this point for what it is is kind of depressing... I wish Christians all were blessed with a more full compliment of spiritual vision, wisdom and enlightenment.

I pray that the ad hominem attacks end and wisdom and civility reign over this website.

- VM

2:51 AM  
Blogger Jeff said...

Vernon said:

It's simply too magnificent and powerful an irony for those with spiritual vision to miss....I pray that the ad hominem attacks end and wisdom and civility reign.

Somehow I'm having a hard time putting the two comments together. Seems like a back handed comments to those who would disagree with your take on this, Vernon.

Most of your post presuppose that the situation being talked about was a good thing. But, it's goodness, etc. is what is being discussed/debated.

We obviously know where you stand! :)

3:46 PM  
Blogger Rebecca said...

"You shall know them by their fruit."

Are Mormons rejecting the herectical beliefs taught by Mormon "prophets" including the belief that many Gods exist? Are they repenting and accepting Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior as a result of the tabernacle and road shows put on by Greg and LDS friends? If not, we can easily identify the spirit at work.

Rebecca R. Carpenter

5:49 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home