[/quote]Originally Posted by dberrie2000 View Post---That places you in a tight position. If the thief had no works--as you admit above--and dead faith = no faith--then you have the thief being saved with dead faith--which you claim is no faith at all.[/quote]Originally Posted by Billyray View Post---What I said does not cancel out anything so I wonder why you persist using this false ***ertion. Salvation comes to those who place their faith in Christ, which is exactly what the thief on the cross did and he was saved despite not having any works. As I have told you multiple times now dead faith = no faith.
[quote] dberrie---How could the thief have had faith when you just stated that--dead faith = no faith.---and then you confirming the thief---was saved despite not having any works..Quote Originally Posted by Billyray View Post---It doesn't put me in a tight position at all because the thief had faith...
That is not a tight spot--it is altogether crossways and transverse to logic.
James 2:20---King James Version (KJV)
[/B]
20 But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?
Billyray--you are toast to your own arguments.How does your judgment change what the Biblical record testifies to?
James 2:20---King James Version (KJV)
20 But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?
How could the thief had had faith when you state---"saved despite not having any works. As I have told you multiple times now dead faith = no faith."





Reply With Quote