Originally Posted by
nrajeffreturns
So some m****cripts are less reliable than others. Then any Bible that used those less-reliable m****cripts, is a less-reliable Bible. That seems so obvious that most people should agree with it.
So the LDS are totally, 100% justified and reasonable in saying that they believe the Bible to be correct if the m****cripts that Bible was based on, are totally reliable m****cripts AND have been translated 100% correctly.
So all you have to do, Billy, is point out which Bible that is, and back it up with compelling evidence, and you will have won the debate, because you will have shown that there IS a Bible that is 100% reliable.
Until you do that, no one is under any obligation to believe your "feeling" that such a Bible exists.